I'd be more than happy if word clock isn't that neccessary i could just use my mbox1, isa220 with some integrated ad/da like rosetta !! blerg!! so i could record, mix, produce more properly / seriously :) then again how different are the two (SOUND QUALITY/RISK WISE) for connecting to an external ad/da? i heard that optical option is more beneficial in terms of lossless aspect of transmission. (if it is ok, inside the PTLE or PT M-POWERED has clock source option. if i were to connect an external ad/da to a LE or M-powered hardware how necessary is it (quality-wise) to get an interface that has both S/PDIF options along with WORD CLOCK?
Mic -> channel strip -> apogee rosetta 200 a/d -> either PTLE DIGI hardware or PT M-powered M audio hardware -> apogee rosetta 200 d/a -> speakers!ġ. I even considered getting mix plus system to get out of this dilemma but i think it'd be too much to handle for me i think.
Word clock da how to#
I don't know how to call it but i wasn't too pleased with the medium high and high end (frequency detail wise) with the mbox-related hardwares. (because i think i saw some articles where someone managed to pull it off like this.) or should i revert back to mbox 2 pro. Or should i consider getting something like firewire1814 (by m-audio)? because then i will be able to have both S/PDIF and WORD CLOK I/Os and will still be able to run PTLE and LOGIC as well?!! i'd like to know whether this could work swiftly enough. i am worried about how much error / jitter or damage it would cause if i were to directly connect my future ad/da into an interface that only has s/pdif but not word clocks with them (something like mbox1, mbox2, digi002 or transit.
Word clock da pro#
which is an apogee produce ad/da converter that has both spdif and wordclock I/Os.īut on the mbox1 it has SPDIF I/O but not word clock (BNC?) I/Os unlike mBOX2 pro which i just sold (:'(). So let's say if i were to purchase ROSETTA 200. (i like programming, editing, arranging in protools so much i even use logic purely as a sampler with the internal IAC midi bus going on)Īnd i recently downgraded from MBOX 2 pro to MBOX 1 in order to add to the budget for both preamp and ad/da solutions. I want to be able to get a decent external ad/da along with a dongle that'll allow me to run either PT M-POWERED or PTLE and both logic at the same time. but somehow it makes things easier for me work very fastly effortlessly and allow me to try, edit so many takes swiftly midi/wave wise and focus more on music i guess in my case. and also i found it slightly more difficult to find the virtual instrument on RTAS platform. tho) not brilliant / comfortable enough when it comes to mixing.
Word clock da software#
software parts and how it sounds kinda neutral and the fact that it is easy to take it to many studios just the way it isīut somehow i find the ad/da's of the LE-associated hardware (although i know there are people who can mix brilliantly on even internal computer speakers!. Ok, i'm some guy trying to do writing, recording, mixing on LE hopefully to a high high standard (all sorts of stuff!)
0 kommentar(er)
